Date

9-17-2026

Department

School of Nursing

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy in Nursing (PhD)

Chair

Ally Brown

Keywords

nursing education, clinical judgment, clinical nurse educators, clinical preceptors, Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric

Disciplines

Education | Nursing

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative, quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest study was to determine whether pretest and posttest Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric scores differed among clinical nurse educators who participated in an educational intervention. The significance of the study arose from the absence of a standardized, evidence-supported framework that clinical nurse educators could use to provide formative feedback to learners. A G*Power analysis identified a required sample of 35 clinical nurse educators from a metropolitan hospital system in the southern United States. The instrument was the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric. Data were collected electronically through Qualtrics before and after the intervention. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs. The findings indicated subtle changes in the educators’ ratings, but the differences were not statistically significant; therefore, the null hypothesis was not rejected. The findings supported further consideration of clinical judgment as a continuously assessed competency in nursing professional development.

Available for download on Sunday, September 16, 2029

Share

COinS