Date

8-20-2026

Department

Helms School of Government

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy in Public Administration (PhD)

Chair

William Clements

Keywords

Blockchain Technology, Blockchain Audit Trails, Ethical Adherence, Stakeholder Feedback Loops, Government Accountability, Public Administration, Federal and State Agencies, Transparency, Public Sector Ethics, Digital Governance

Disciplines

Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration

Abstract

This dissertation explores the impacts of blockchain-based audit trails and stakeholder feedback loops on ethical conduct in U.S. federal and state public administration. The study addresses ongoing ethical problems in government, such as low levels of accountability, inadequate procedures, policy manipulation, and a waning public confidence in government, despite the existence of government ethics codes and oversight bodies. Ethical adherence is considered using two complementary theories: the virtue theory (Honesty, Fairness, Integrity, Responsiveness, Trust) and the deontological theory (Duty fulfillment, Rule following, Documentation, Accountability, Procedural compliance). The study was conducted with closed and open-ended answers from public administration participants who have experience in ethics, compliance, audit, procurement, oversight, stakeholder engagement, or other related areas using an anonymous online survey via Google Forms. Ten responses were received and nine valid responses were analyzed. The findings revealed that audit trails linked to blockchain were seen as the most beneficial for holding accountable, tracing, ensuring record integrity, reviewing and ensuring duty-based compliance. Stakeholder feedback loops were seen as most beneficial for fairness, honesty, telling the truth, responsiveness and public trust. The two tools were perceived as complementary tools and not as competing tools. The results, however, also showed that transparency instruments are not necessarily the drivers of ethical behavior. They rely on leadership, staff development, correct data entry, active data review, meaningful follow-up to feedback, and follow-through on actions. The study brings to the public administration literature a connection between mechanisms of transparency and ethical adherence in both virtue-based and duty-based approaches. It provides pragmatic advice to agencies that want to build ethical governance through technology, participation, and organizational culture in complex federal, state, and government-adjacent administrative contexts, in everyday practice.

Download

Share

COinS