Date
5-20-2026
Department
Graduate School of Business
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy in Organization and Management (PhD)
Chair
Jimmy Payne
Keywords
crisis leadership, high-stakes crisis, emotional regulation, experience-based decision-making, leadership effectiveness, organizational outcomes
Disciplines
Leadership Studies
Recommended Citation
Calderwood, Robert Thomas, "Organizational Outcomes in Crisis: A Multi-Case Exploration of Leadership Practices in High-Stakes Crises" (2026). Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 8483.
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/8483
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative multiple case study was to explore how organizational leaders navigate high-stakes crises, with a focus on cognitive, emotional, and crisis response leadership processes, as well as decision-making, and organizational factors that influence outcomes. Grounded in a pragmatic research paradigm, this study explored the experiences of leaders across multiple industries that frequently encounter high-stakes crisis events. Research data was collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns and key themes. The findings revealed that crisis leadership is a dynamic and iterative process characterized by cognitive processing, emotional regulation, crisis response behaviors, and experience-based decision-making. Leaders consistently relied on prior experience to interpret evolving situations, regulate emotional responses, and make timely decisions under conditions of urgency and uncertainty. Communication emerged as a critical mechanism for coordinating team efforts, while effective leadership approaches emphasized adaptability, collaboration, and the ability to maintain composure in high-stress environments. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing an integrated, practice-oriented understanding of crisis leadership that extends beyond traditional command-and-control models. The findings offer practical insights for leadership development, training, and organizational preparedness, while advancing theoretical perspectives on leadership as an iterative, experience-driven process. These results provide a foundation for future research and support the development of more effective leadership strategies in high-stakes crisis environments.
