Date
1-14-2026
Department
Helms School of Government
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy in Public Administration (PhD)
Chair
Jason Ross
Keywords
resilient leadership, public administration, Abraham Lincoln, rhetoric, relationships, crisis, Civil War
Disciplines
History | Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration
Recommended Citation
Baker, Wayne Morris, "Resilient Leadership In Action: The Rhetoric AND Relationships of Abraham Lincoln for Today’s Public Administration" (2026). Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 7890.
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/7890
Abstract
Public administration faces growing volatility and complexity, requiring leadership models that extend beyond traditional management paradigms. This qualitative, historical-explanatory case study introduces and tests a multidimensional theory of resilient leadership in public administration through the rhetoric and relationships of Abraham Lincoln during his presidency. Guided by one central and four sub-research questions, the study analyzes fifty-six of Lincoln’s letters, speeches, and memoranda alongside fifteen diary entries by Navy Secretary Gideon Welles. Using a dual framework that integrates the Four-Factor Leadership Model and the proposed five-dimensional resilient leadership model: adaptability and learning, ethical decision-making and integrity, collaborative governance and stakeholder engagement, emotional and psychological strength, and strategic vision for long-term sustainability, the study identifies how Lincoln’s behaviors characterized resilient leadership amid national crisis. Findings reveal that Lincoln’s rhetorical clarity, ethical consistency, and relational acumen advanced national unity and institutional trust under extreme pressure. His leadership demonstrates an enduring balance of empathy and decisiveness, strategic vision and adaptability, that informs modern public-sector resilience allowing greater public value. The study contributes to leadership theory by merging historical analysis with contemporary administrative challenges, offering an actionable framework for cultivating resilient leadership in governance. Policy implications underscore the need for leadership development grounded in adaptability, integrity, collaboration, and emotional strength. Recommendations call for future empirical testing of this framework across organizational and governmental contexts.
