Date

8-6-2025

Department

School of Education

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy in Education (PhD)

Chair

Jillian L. Wendt

Keywords

educational technology, online learning, student engagement, cognitive load, technology self-efficacy

Disciplines

Higher Education | Online and Distance Education

Abstract

The purpose of this quantitative predictive correlational design study was to examine if and to what extent the number of educational technology (edtech) tools in a course and student gender could predict engagement in online courses among New York City graduate education students. As higher education institutions continue to integrate diverse technologies into their online learning environments, understanding how the use of many tools influences student engagement is important for instructional design, policy, and pedagogy. The participants for this study included a sample of 142 students drawn from the population of graduate students enrolled in different online sections of the same online course offered at a graduate school of education in New York City. The setting for this study was the graduate online course sections. Data was collected using the Motivation and Engagement Scale—University/College (MES–UC). The digital version of the instrument was offered via an email link to the participants as part of the end-of-course activities. Data collected was analyzed using multiple linear regression after initial data screening for errors, missing entries, and inconsistencies. The results revealed that neither the number of edtech tools nor student gender significantly predicted engagement. The overall regression model explained less than 1% of the variance in student engagement (R2 = .003, F (2, 139) = .193, p = .825). The findings suggest that the quantity of edtech tools and student gender alone may not be sufficient predictors of engagement in graduate online courses. Future research should explore additional variables such as instructional quality, student-student and instructor-student interactions, technology self-efficacy, and cognitive load. Longitudinal, experimental, or mixed methods studies are recommended to provide deeper insights into student engagement.

Available for download on Saturday, August 05, 2028

Share

COinS