Date

8-6-2025

Department

Helms School of Government

Degree

Doctor of Philosophy in Public Administration (PhD)

Chair

Lonnie Brinson

Keywords

constraints, culturally diverse, budgetary process, low to median-income families

Disciplines

Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration

Abstract

The purpose of this applied study was to explore the intricate relationship between political, economic, and social constraints on the budgetary process and their consequential impact on low to median-income families in Richmond, Virginia. Utilizing a multimethod approach, the research objective was to combine quantitative analysis of fiscal allocations, economic indicators, and demographic data with qualitative insights from semi-structured interviews with policymakers, financial experts, and the affected families. Through a sequential exploratory design, the study aimed to employ qualitative data to understand contextual and nuanced impacts of budgetary decisions. These insights informed the quantitative phase, where statistical analysis elucidated patterns and relationships between the constraints and their effects on the targeted population. Findings revealed that political agendas and economic constraints significantly influenced budgetary allocations, often sidelining the needs of low to median-income families. Social constraints, including systemic biases and lack of representation, further exacerbated these effects, decreasing access to essential services and opportunities for these families. The study intent was to underscore the need for a more inclusive and equitable approach to budgetary planning and decision-making processes. By integrating the voices of the marginalized and considering the multifaceted impacts of political, economic, and social constraints, policymakers were able to foster a more resilient and supportive community in Richmond.

Download

Share

COinS