Date
3-21-2025
Department
School of Music
Degree
Doctor of Worship Studies (DWS)
Chair
Scott Connell
Keywords
Worship, Music, Curriculum, Education, Assessment, Competencies
Disciplines
Liturgy and Worship | Music
Recommended Citation
Kinchen, John Dawson III, "A Comparison of Two Worship Education Programs and the Relative Effectiveness of Preparing Worship Leaders for the 21st Century Evangelical Church" (2025). Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 6593.
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/6593
Abstract
This dissertation examines and compares the worship leadership programs at Liberty University and Union University, focusing on their curriculum design, development, and effectiveness in preparing worship leaders for the 21st-century modern evangelical church. Utilizing a multiple-case study methodology, the research traces the historical development of these programs, evaluates their curricular frameworks, and analyzes their alignment with the standards set by the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM). The study identifies shared core learning competencies, including music theory, conducting, ensemble participation, and theological understanding, while highlighting unique strengths in each program's approach.
Liberty University’s curriculum emphasizes contemporary worship practices, integrating technology and practical application through specialized courses. Union University’s program balances traditional and modern worship practices, offering immersive learning experiences through worship leadership labs, techniques courses, and expanded applied lesson opportunities. Both programs reflect a commitment to equipping worship leaders with the theological, musical, technological, and leadership skills necessary for effective ministry in diverse contexts.
The findings underscore the significance of aligning worship education with the evolving demands of modern evangelical churches, emphasizing the integration of experiential learning, technology, and the need to strike a balance between traditional and contemporary practices. While the study provides valuable insights, its scope is limited to two institutions, suggesting the need for broader investigations across more programs. This research contributes to the discourse on worship education, offering a framework for evaluating and improving curricula to prepare leaders for dynamic worship environments.
