Date
4-2012
Department
School of Education
Degree
Doctor of Education (EdD)
Chair
Judy Shoemaker
Primary Subject Area
Education, Elementary; Education, Early Childhood
Keywords
benchmark assessments, empowerment, literacy, mathematics, progress monitoring, Response to Intervention
Disciplines
Curriculum and Instruction | Education | Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
Recommended Citation
Barge, Evie Taff, "Teacher Empowerment in the Implementation of Response to Intervention: A Case Study" (2012). Doctoral Dissertations and Projects. 505.
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/505
Abstract
Response to Intervention (RtI) is a data-driven process that supports the academic needs of students through targeted interventions to address specific identified areas of weakness. When implemented effectively, RtI aids students at the onset of learning concerns and can remediate learning problems which have, in the past, led to students being classified as learning disabled. Few studies have recognized the role of teachers at the frontlines in implementing RtI, and many teachers are struggling with the complicated RtI process. Literacy and mathematics are the academic focuses for RtI in this study due to their importance for success in school and later as young people enter society beyond their K-12 years. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of teacher empowerment on the implementation of RtI by examining teachers' experiences and measuring the students' progress on benchmark tests. Six teachers involved in the RtI implementation at Target Schools A and B were interviewed and observed, and their progress-monitoring data was examined. In this study, the effect of teacher empowerment was documented as the teachers began to take an active role in the RtI implementation at the school level by using their strengths in the classroom to lead the school staff in professional development to improve instruction in the RtI process.
Included in
Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons