Category

Oral - Textual or Investigative

Description

This research examines the connection between the world-week eschatological/apologetic schema and the development of Christian chronicons from the early church until the Carolingians. For young age creationists, knowing the age of the earth is incredibly important for constructing a working model of world history. Within the last decade, this has prompted renewed interest in the study of ancient Christian chronicons, specifically to understand what, if anything, the early church did with the systematic differences in the reported ages of the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies. This engagement, primarily done by Henry Smith of Associates for Biblical Research and Lita Cosner of Creation Ministries International, has largely been to “recruit” church fathers rather than revisiting them, seeking to understand their theological context and motives. One major point of theological context that is commonly ignored is that of the concept of the world week and its use as an apologetic tool and an eschatological framework. This research begins by examining the Jewish context of Messianic chronological schemas and messianic date setting formulas in such as “The Book of Jubilees,” “the Book of Enoch,” “The Testament of Adam,” and the Babylonian Talmud. From this background, the Christian development of the world-week formula from an eschatological date-setting formula to an apologetic argument based on LXX numbers will be traced from Pseudo-Barnabas to the Carolingian shift from AM to AD. This world-week formula also serves as one among a host of reasons why many in the early church made use of the LXX in their chronicons rather than the MT.

Comments

Graduate

Share

COinS
 
Apr 17th, 10:00 AM

Counting the Days: The Connection Between Chronology and Eschatology in the Early Church

Oral - Textual or Investigative

This research examines the connection between the world-week eschatological/apologetic schema and the development of Christian chronicons from the early church until the Carolingians. For young age creationists, knowing the age of the earth is incredibly important for constructing a working model of world history. Within the last decade, this has prompted renewed interest in the study of ancient Christian chronicons, specifically to understand what, if anything, the early church did with the systematic differences in the reported ages of the Genesis 5 and 11 genealogies. This engagement, primarily done by Henry Smith of Associates for Biblical Research and Lita Cosner of Creation Ministries International, has largely been to “recruit” church fathers rather than revisiting them, seeking to understand their theological context and motives. One major point of theological context that is commonly ignored is that of the concept of the world week and its use as an apologetic tool and an eschatological framework. This research begins by examining the Jewish context of Messianic chronological schemas and messianic date setting formulas in such as “The Book of Jubilees,” “the Book of Enoch,” “The Testament of Adam,” and the Babylonian Talmud. From this background, the Christian development of the world-week formula from an eschatological date-setting formula to an apologetic argument based on LXX numbers will be traced from Pseudo-Barnabas to the Carolingian shift from AM to AD. This world-week formula also serves as one among a host of reasons why many in the early church made use of the LXX in their chronicons rather than the MT.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.