Date

5-1-2025

Department

Rawlings School of Divinity

Degree

Master of Arts in Theological Studies (MATS)

Chair

Roy Lucas

Keywords

authority, early Christianity, apostolic fathers, biblical authority, Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp, Papias, ecclesiology, Sola Scriptura, patristic studies, biblical theology, philosophical theology

Disciplines

Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion

Abstract

The concept of authority, though seemingly clear in everyday discourse, is in fact a multifaceted and elusive subject upon closer examination. This paper seeks to untangle the intricacies of authority in order to better understand and discuss biblical and early Christian positions regarding the matter. The study begins by surveying the philosophical literature on authority to establish a clear and robust vocabulary for discussing the topic. Differentiating between the various concepts and paradigms of authority helps avoid the pitfalls of vague or inconsistent usage that have hindered the historical, philosophical, and theological debates on the matter.

Central to this thesis is the distinction between sociological and ontological accounts of authority. Ontological authority is rooted in some intrinsic power or ability of the authority bearer. In contrast, sociological authority is more contingent and relational, describing voluntarily entered social relationships for the purpose of attaining some shared goal. This insight frames the proceeding analysis and illuminates the ways in which early Christian leaders viewed the various sources of authority that they appealed to. Ultimately, this paper aspires to provide a nuanced framework for understanding authority and thereby contribute to a clearer, more coherent dialogue about authority in Christian history and theology.

Share

COinS