Date
8-24-2023
Department
Rawlings School of Divinity
Degree
Master of Arts in Christian Apologetics (MA)
Chair
Douglas K. Blount
Keywords
Morality, Christianity, Subjective, Objective, Abductive
Disciplines
Arts and Humanities
Recommended Citation
Christopher, Michael Stephen, "An Abductive Argument for Christianity Being the Best Source for Morality" (2023). Masters Theses. 1050.
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/masters/1050
Abstract
This thesis begins by presenting questions on morality, its source, its means, as well as questions on which type of morality seems best for humanity. The thesis discusses subjective morality, objective morality, and the foundations for both subjective morality and objective morality. Further, some problems and some solutions are offered in discerning which type of morality ought to be lived. Through the portion related to subjective morality, relativism is intertwined and authors, like J. L. Mackie, Paul Brockelman, and Richard Rorty are mentioned. Later, an atheistic version of objective morality via Sam Harris’s The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values is compared to an objective morality through Christianity. Points from relevant authors regarding the source for objective morality, the atheistic version compared to a theistic version through Christianity, and related arguments are examined. The thesis concludes with which source for morality appears to be the best in this abductive argument.