Robert Koch, Creation, and the Specificity of Germs

Author(s)

Alan L. Gillen, Liberty UniversityFollow
Douglas Oliver
Frank Sherwin

Publication Date

4-7-2010

Document Type

Article

Disciplines

Biology

Abstract

Microbiology is dominated by evolution today. Just look at any text, journal article, or the topics presented at professional scientific meetings. Darwin is dominant.

Microbiology is dominated by evolution today. Just look at any text, journal article, or the topics presented at professional scientific meetings. Darwin is dominant. Many argue that “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” (Dobzhansky 1973). But it was not always this way. In fact, a review of the major founders of microbiology has shown that they were creationists.1 We would argue that a better idea thanevolution and one of much more practical importance is the germ theory of disease, originally put forth primarily by non-Darwinian biologists (Gillen and Oliver 2009). In our previous article (Gillen and Oliver 2009), we documented these and many other creation and Christian contributions to germ theory. But only recently has it become known that another important microbiology founder, Robert Koch (Fig. 1) and his co-workers were Linnaean creationists in their classification.2 This is due, in part, to additional works of Robert Koch that were translated from German to English. The year 2010 marks the 100^thanniversary of his death (died: May 27, 1910). Although Koch and other German microbiologists were fairly secular in their thinking, their acceptance of Darwinian evolution was minimal.

Recommended Citation

Gillen, Alan L.; Oliver, Douglas; and Sherwin, Frank, "Robert Koch, Creation, and the Specificity of Germs" (2010). Faculty Publications and Presentations. 140.
https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/bio_chem_fac_pubs/140